Information about Retrocession (district Of Columbia)

The District of Columbia, the national capital of the United States, was formed in 1790 from 100 square miles (0 km) that were ceded to the federal government by the states of Maryland and Virginia.

Retrocession is defined as the reversal of a cession, returning land to the entities to which it originally belonged. The 32 square miles (83 km) originally ceded by Virginia were returned to Virginia in 1847, and some have proposed that the remaining 68 square miles (176 km) be returned to Maryland.

Virginia retrocession

Almost immediately after the "Federal City" was laid out north of the Potomac River, the residents south of the Potomac in Alexandria County, D.C. began petitioning to be returned to Virginia's jurisdiction. Over time, a movement grew to separate Alexandria from the District for several reasons:

• Alexandria was an important port and market in the Atlantic slave trade. There was increasing talk of abolition of slavery in the national capital, and Alexandria's economy would suffer greatly if slavery were outlawed.
• There was an active abolition movement in Virginia, and the pro-slavery forces held a slim majority in the Virginia General Assembly. (Eighteen years later, in the American Civil War, the most anti-slavery counties would secede from Virginia to form West Virginia.) If Alexandria and Alexandria County were retroceded to Virginia, they would provide two new pro-slavery representatives.
• Alexandria's economy had stagnated as competition with the port of Georgetown, D.C. had begun to favor the north side of the Potomac. The Chesapeake and Ohio Canal was already helping Georgetown take more business from Alexandria, and the canal was still being extended.
• Alexandria's residents had lost representation and the right to vote at any level of government.

After a referendum, voters petitioned Congress and Virginia to return the area to Virginia. By an act of Congress on 9 July, 1846, and with the approval of the Virginia General Assembly, the area south of the Potomac, 39 square miles (101 km²), was returned, or "retroceded," to Virginia effective in 1847. [1]

The retroceded land was then known as Alexandria County, Virginia, and now includes a portion of the independent city of Alexandria and all of Arlington County, the successor to Alexandria County. A large portion of the retroceded land near the river was an estate of George Washington Parke Custis. It would be passed on to his daughter and her husband, Robert E. Lee, and would eventually become Arlington National Cemetery.

Proposed Maryland retrocession

It has been proposed that the remainder of the District be given back to Maryland. Retrocession would take a simple act of Congress, though it is generally accepted that Congress would not take such a step without the approval of Marylanders and Washingtonians via referendums. Currently, there is little support for retrocession, though some see it as a solution to the twin problems of D.C. voting rights and D.C. home rule.

Such a move, according to some, would be constitutional if at least the part of the District that contains the main offices of government (the National Capital Service Area) were to remain in the District officially; the U.S. Constitution permits a national capital that is not a part of any State as long as it is "not exceeding ten Miles square." However, it is unclear if the Constitution even requires the creation of a District to begin with; after all, the country did not have such a district until Washington was founded. If it does, then such a move would require, as a technicality, the repeal of the 23rd Amendment due to there being no citizens of such a district. The only residents of such a rump district would be the First Family, who vote in their hometown, plus some homeless people.

The remainder of Washington would become a city in Maryland, allowing residents to vote for Maryland's Congressional delegation like any other resident of the state, as well as in state elections.

Arguments for retrocession

Proponents like the Committee for the Capital City feel such a move would be of financial benefit to Washington; the city would be relieved of burdens not shared by other American cities such as running a prison system and a Department of Motor Vehicles, and it would finally be free from the veto power of the United States Congress. Maryland would benefit from the prestige of being the home state of the national capital of the world's superpower and would gain additional tax revenue. Congress would benefit from no longer having to scrutinize the decisions of the city government; committees overseeing DC government have traditionally been amongst the least prestigious jobs for members. Further, it would give most residents of the District a say in federal government, as they would be able to vote for a representative and senators, and thus have representation.

Arguments against retrocession

Proponents of D.C. statehood are against the idea of retrocession because they feel that the city, having been separated from Maryland since the 18th century, has a separate identity; although Maryland is mere city blocks away from many Washingtonians, there is no connection to the state for them. Others see it as a means to block proper representation, which they feel includes two senators. Because the city is a stronghold of the Democratic Party, Republicans in the Senate would not be eager to admit the District as a state. Republicans would have less of a problem giving the city back to Maryland, as that would, given the city's current population, add only a single Democrat to the House of Representatives. Many in Washington object to Maryland's use of the death penalty, which has been abolished in the District. Many in Maryland, meanwhile, object to retrocession because they feel that the city, which has relatively high crime and poverty rates, would be a burden on state government agencies. Others feel that the federal government should have a role in running the national capital; such a role allows for proper management of the city as a symbol of the nation and can be used to reject projects that would be seen by a majority of Americans as ruinous to the capital. Finally, the measure still fails to completely solve the problem of voting representation for all Washingtonians, because any transfer of less than the entirety of the District could still leave some citizens without representation.

Current legislation

On April 16, 2007, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced H.R. 1858, the "District of Columbia-Maryland Reunion Act," which would transfer the bulk of Washington to Maryland if Maryland will have it. [2]

See also

• Washington, D.C.
• District of Columbia voting rights
• District of Columbia home rule
• District of Columbia Vote in House of Representatives
• D.C. Statehood

External links

• Committee for the Capital City (pro-retrocession)
• The Debates over the Retrocession of the District of Columbia, 1801–2004