Information about Utility
In economics, utility is a measure of the relative satisfaction or desiredness from consumption of goods. Given this measure, one may speak meaningfully of increasing or decreasing utility, and thereby explain economic behavior in terms of attempts to increase one's utility. A theoretical unit of measurement for utility is the 'util'.
The doctrine of utilitarianism saw the maximization of utility as a moral criterion for the organization of society. According to utilitarians, such as Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1876), society should aim to maximize the total utility of individuals, aiming for "the greatest happiness for the greatest number".
In neoclassical economics, rationality is precisely defined in terms of imputed utility-maximizing behavior under economic constraints. As a hypothetical behavioral measure, utility does not require attribution of mental states suggested by "happiness", "satisfaction", etc.
Utility is applied by economists in such constructs as the indifference curve, which plots the combination of commodities that an individual or a society requires to maintain a given level of satisfaction. Individual utility and social utility can be construed as the dependent variable of a utility function (such as an indifference curve map) and a social welfare function respectively. When coupled with production or commodity constraints, these functions can represent Pareto efficiency, such as illustrated by Edgeworth boxes and contract curves. Such efficiency is a central concept of welfare economics.
Utility functions of both sorts assign real numbers (utils) to members of a choice set. For example, suppose a cup of coffee has utility of 120 utils, a cup of tea has a utility of 80 utils, and a cup of water has a utility of 40 utils. When speaking of cardinal utility, it could be concluded that the cup of coffee is exactly the same amount better than a cup of tea as the cup of tea is better than the cup of water.
It is tempting when dealing with cardinal utility to aggregate utilities across persons. The argument against this is that interpersonal comparisons of utility are suspect because there is no good way to interpret how different people value consumption bundles.
When ordinal utilities are used, differences in utils are treated as ethically or behaviorally meaningless: the utility values assigned encode a full behavioral ordering between members of a choice set, but nothing about strength of preferences. In the above example, it would only be possible to say that coffee is preferred to tea to water, but no more.
Neoclassical economics has largely retreated from using cardinal utility functions as the basic objects of economic analysis, in favor of considering agent preferences over choice sets. As will be seen in subsequent sections, however, preference relations can often be rationalized as utility functions satisfying a variety of useful properties.
Ordinal utility functions are equivalent up to monotone transformations, while cardinal utilities are equivalent up to positive linear transformations.
ranks each package in the consumption set. If u(x) ≥ u(y) (x R y), then the consumer strictly prefers x to y or is indifferent between them.
For example, suppose a consumer's consumption set is X = {nothing, 1 apple, 1 orange, 1 apple and 1 orange, 2 apples, 2 oranges}, and its utility function is u(nothing) = 0, u (1 apple) = 1, u (1 orange) = 2, u (1 apple and 1 orange) = 4, u (2 apples) = 2 and u (2 oranges) = 3. Then this consumer prefers 1 orange to 1 apple, but prefers one of each to 2 oranges.
In microeconomic models, there are usually a finite set of L commodities, and a consumer may consume an arbitrary amount of each commodity. This gives a consumption set of
, and each package
is a vector containing the amounts of each commodity. In the previous example, we might say there are two commodities: apples and oranges. If we say apples is the first commodity, and oranges the second, then the consumption set X =
and u (0, 0) = 0, u (1, 0) = 1, u (0, 1) = 2, u (1, 1) = 4, u (2, 0) = 2, u (0, 2) = 3 as before. Note that for u to be a utility function on X, it must be defined for every package in X.
A utility function
rationalizes a preference relation
on X if
for every
,
if and only if
. If u rationalizes
, then this implies
is complete and transitive, and hence rational.
In order to simplify calculations, various assumptions have been made of utility functions.
Lexicographic preferences cannot even be represented by a utility function.
The expected utility model was first proposed by Daniel Bernoulli as a solution to the St. Petersburg paradox. Bernoulli argued that the paradox could be resolved if decisionmakers displayed risk aversion and argued for a logarithmic cardinal utility function.
The first important use of the expected utility theory was that of John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern who used the assumption of expected utility maximization in their formulation of game theory.
A von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function
assigns a real number to every element of the outcome space in a way that captures the agent's preferences over both simple and compound lotteries (put in category-theoretic language,
induces a morphism between the category of preferences under uncertainty and the category of reals). The agent will prefer a lottery
to a lottery
if and only if the expected utility (iterated over compound lotteries if necessary) of
is greater than the expected utility of
.
Restricting to the discrete choice context, let
be a simple lottery such that
, where
is the probability that
is won. We may also consider compound lotteries, where the prizes are themselves simple lotteries.
The expected utility theorem says that a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function exists if and only if the agent's preference relation on the space of simple lotteries satisfies four axioms: completeness, transitivity, convexity/continuity (also called the Archimedean property), and independence.
Completeness and transitivity are discussed supra. The Archimedean property says that for simple lotteries
, then there exists a
such that the agent is indifferent between
and the compound lottery mixing between
and
with probability
and
, respectively. Independence means that if the agent is indifferent between simple lotteries
and
, the agent is also indifferent between
mixed with an arbitrary simple lottery
with probability
and
mixed with
with the same probability
.
Independence is probably the most controversial of the axioms. A variety of generalized expected utility theories have arisen, most of which drop or relax the independence axiom.
..... Click the link for more information.
The doctrine of utilitarianism saw the maximization of utility as a moral criterion for the organization of society. According to utilitarians, such as Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1876), society should aim to maximize the total utility of individuals, aiming for "the greatest happiness for the greatest number".
In neoclassical economics, rationality is precisely defined in terms of imputed utility-maximizing behavior under economic constraints. As a hypothetical behavioral measure, utility does not require attribution of mental states suggested by "happiness", "satisfaction", etc.
Utility is applied by economists in such constructs as the indifference curve, which plots the combination of commodities that an individual or a society requires to maintain a given level of satisfaction. Individual utility and social utility can be construed as the dependent variable of a utility function (such as an indifference curve map) and a social welfare function respectively. When coupled with production or commodity constraints, these functions can represent Pareto efficiency, such as illustrated by Edgeworth boxes and contract curves. Such efficiency is a central concept of welfare economics.
Cardinal/ordinal utility
Economists distinguish between cardinal utility and ordinal utility. When cardinal utility is used, the magnitude of utility differences is treated as an ethically or behaviorally significant quantity. On the other hand, ordinal utility captures only ranking and not strength of preferences. An important example of a cardinal utility is the probability of achieving some target.Utility functions of both sorts assign real numbers (utils) to members of a choice set. For example, suppose a cup of coffee has utility of 120 utils, a cup of tea has a utility of 80 utils, and a cup of water has a utility of 40 utils. When speaking of cardinal utility, it could be concluded that the cup of coffee is exactly the same amount better than a cup of tea as the cup of tea is better than the cup of water.
It is tempting when dealing with cardinal utility to aggregate utilities across persons. The argument against this is that interpersonal comparisons of utility are suspect because there is no good way to interpret how different people value consumption bundles.
When ordinal utilities are used, differences in utils are treated as ethically or behaviorally meaningless: the utility values assigned encode a full behavioral ordering between members of a choice set, but nothing about strength of preferences. In the above example, it would only be possible to say that coffee is preferred to tea to water, but no more.
Neoclassical economics has largely retreated from using cardinal utility functions as the basic objects of economic analysis, in favor of considering agent preferences over choice sets. As will be seen in subsequent sections, however, preference relations can often be rationalized as utility functions satisfying a variety of useful properties.
Ordinal utility functions are equivalent up to monotone transformations, while cardinal utilities are equivalent up to positive linear transformations.
Utility functions
While preferences are the conventional foundation of microeconomics, it is convenient to represent preferences with a utility function and reason indirectly about preferences with utility functions. Let X be the consumption set, the set of all mutually-exclusive packages the consumer could conceivably consume (such as an indifference curve map without the indifference curves). The consumer's utility function
ranks each package in the consumption set. If u(x) ≥ u(y) (x R y), then the consumer strictly prefers x to y or is indifferent between them.
For example, suppose a consumer's consumption set is X = {nothing, 1 apple, 1 orange, 1 apple and 1 orange, 2 apples, 2 oranges}, and its utility function is u(nothing) = 0, u (1 apple) = 1, u (1 orange) = 2, u (1 apple and 1 orange) = 4, u (2 apples) = 2 and u (2 oranges) = 3. Then this consumer prefers 1 orange to 1 apple, but prefers one of each to 2 oranges.
In microeconomic models, there are usually a finite set of L commodities, and a consumer may consume an arbitrary amount of each commodity. This gives a consumption set of
, and each package
is a vector containing the amounts of each commodity. In the previous example, we might say there are two commodities: apples and oranges. If we say apples is the first commodity, and oranges the second, then the consumption set X =
and u (0, 0) = 0, u (1, 0) = 1, u (0, 1) = 2, u (1, 1) = 4, u (2, 0) = 2, u (0, 2) = 3 as before. Note that for u to be a utility function on X, it must be defined for every package in X.
A utility function
rationalizes a preference relation
on X if
for every
,
if and only if
. If u rationalizes
, then this implies
is complete and transitive, and hence rational.
In order to simplify calculations, various assumptions have been made of utility functions.
- CES (constant elasticity of substitution, or isoelastic) utility is one with constant relative risk aversion
- Exponential utility exhibits constant absolute risk aversion
- Quasilinear utility
- Homothetic utility
Lexicographic preferences cannot even be represented by a utility function.
Expected utility
The expected utility model was first proposed by Daniel Bernoulli as a solution to the St. Petersburg paradox. Bernoulli argued that the paradox could be resolved if decisionmakers displayed risk aversion and argued for a logarithmic cardinal utility function.
The first important use of the expected utility theory was that of John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern who used the assumption of expected utility maximization in their formulation of game theory.
A von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function
assigns a real number to every element of the outcome space in a way that captures the agent's preferences over both simple and compound lotteries (put in category-theoretic language,
induces a morphism between the category of preferences under uncertainty and the category of reals). The agent will prefer a lottery
to a lottery
if and only if the expected utility (iterated over compound lotteries if necessary) of
is greater than the expected utility of
.
Restricting to the discrete choice context, let
be a simple lottery such that
, where
is the probability that
is won. We may also consider compound lotteries, where the prizes are themselves simple lotteries.
The expected utility theorem says that a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function exists if and only if the agent's preference relation on the space of simple lotteries satisfies four axioms: completeness, transitivity, convexity/continuity (also called the Archimedean property), and independence.
Completeness and transitivity are discussed supra. The Archimedean property says that for simple lotteries
, then there exists a
such that the agent is indifferent between
and the compound lottery mixing between
and
with probability
and
, respectively. Independence means that if the agent is indifferent between simple lotteries
and
, the agent is also indifferent between
mixed with an arbitrary simple lottery
with probability
and
mixed with
with the same probability
.
Independence is probably the most controversial of the axioms. A variety of generalized expected utility theories have arisen, most of which drop or relax the independence axiom.
Discussion and criticism
Different value systems have different perspectives on the use of utility in making moral judgments. For example, Marxists, Kantians, and certain libertarians (such as Nozick) all believe utility to be irrelevant as a moral standard or at least not as important as other factors such as natural rights, law, conscience and/or religious doctrine. It is debatable whether any of these can be adequately represented in a system that uses a utility model.See also
- Allais paradox
- behavioral economics
- consumer surplus
- convex preferences
- decision theory
- efficient market theory
- expectation utilities
- Ellsberg paradox
- game theory
- list of economics topics
- marginal utility
- microeconomics
- prospect theory
- cumulative prospect theory
- risk aversion
- risk premium
- Transferable utility
- Utility Maximization Problem
- utility (patent)
- utility model
References and additional reading
- Neumann, John von and Morgenstern, Oskar Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press. 1944 sec.ed. 1947
- Nash Jr., John F. The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica 18:155 1950
- Anand, Paul. Foundations of Rational Choice Under Risk Oxford, Oxford University Press. 1993 reprinted 1995, 2002
- Kreps, David M. Notes on the Theory of Choice. Boulder, CO. Westview Press. 1988
- Fishburn, Peter C. Utility Theory for Decision Making. Huntington, NY. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co. 1970
Economics is the social science that studies the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. The term economics comes from the Greek for oikos (house) and nomos (custom or law), hence "rules of the house(hold).
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
A good or commodity in economics is any object or service that increases utility, directly or indirectly, not to be confused with good in a moral or ethical sense (see Utilitarianism and consequentialist ethical theory).
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
Utilitarianism is the ethical doctrine that the moral worth of an action is solely determined by its contribution to overall utility. It is thus a form of consequentialism, meaning that the moral worth of an action is determined by its outcome—the ends justify the means.
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
Jeremy Bentham (IPA: ['benθəm]) (26 February [O.S. 15 February 15] 1748) – June 6, 1832) was an English jurist, philosopher, and legal and social reformer.
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
John Stuart Mill (20 May 1806 – 8 May 1873), British philosopher, political economist, civil servant and Member of Parliament, was an influential liberal thinker of the 19th century.
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
An indifference curve in microeconomic theory is a graph showing different bundles of goods, each measured as to quantity, between which a consumer is indifferent. That is, at each point on the curve, the consumer has no preference for one bundle over another.
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
In mathematics, an independent variable is any of the arguments, i.e. "inputs", to a function. These are contrasted with the dependent variable, which is the value, i.e. the "output", of the function.
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
In economics a social welfare function can be defined as a real-valued function that ranks conceivable social states (alternative complete descriptions of the society) from lowest on up as to welfare of the society.
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
Pareto efficiency, or Pareto optimality, is an important notion in economics with broad applications in game theory, engineering and the social sciences. The term is named after Vilfredo Pareto, an Italian economist who used the concept in his studies of economic efficiency
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
In economics, an Edgeworth box, named after Francis Ysidro Edgeworth, is a way of representing various distributions of resources. Edgeworth made his presentation in his famous book, Mathematical Psychics: An essay on the application of mathematics to the moral sciences
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
contract curve is the individually rational subset of the Pareto set. In other words, it is the set of Pareto efficient points such that both agents are at least as well off as under their endowment.
See welfare economics and list of economics topics.
..... Click the link for more information.
See welfare economics and list of economics topics.
..... Click the link for more information.
Welfare economics is a branch of economics that uses microeconomic techniques to simultaneously determine allocative efficiency within an economy and the income distribution associated with it.
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
In economics, cardinal utility is a theory of utility under which the utility (roughly, satisfaction) gained from a particular good or service can be measured and that the magnitude of the measurement is meaningful.
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
Ordinal utility theory states that while the utility of a particular good and service cannot be measured using an objective scale, a consumer is capable of ranking different alternatives available. Goods are often considered in ‘bundles’ or ‘baskets’.
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
Neoclassical economics refers to a general approach in economics focusing on the determination of prices, outputs, and income distributions in markets through supply and demand.
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
Preference (or "taste") is a concept, used in the social sciences, particularly economics. It assumes a real or imagined "choice" between alternatives and the possibility of rank ordering of these alternatives, based on happiness, satisfaction, gratification, enjoyment, utility
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
In mathematics, the phrase "up to xxxx" indicates that members of an equivalence class are to be regarded as a single entity for some purpose. "xxxx" describes a property or process which transforms an element into one from the same equivalence class, i.e.
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
Preference (or "taste") is a concept, used in the social sciences, particularly economics. It assumes a real or imagined "choice" between alternatives and the possibility of rank ordering of these alternatives, based on happiness, satisfaction, gratification, enjoyment, utility
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
Microeconomics (or price theory) is a branch of economics that studies how individuals, households, and firms make decisions to allocate limited resources,[1] typically in markets where goods or services are being bought and sold.
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
An indifference curve in microeconomic theory is a graph showing different bundles of goods, each measured as to quantity, between which a consumer is indifferent. That is, at each point on the curve, the consumer has no preference for one bundle over another.
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
“Iff” redirects here. For other uses, see IFF.
If and only if, in logic and fields that rely on it such as mathematics and philosophy, is a logical connective between statements which means that the truth of either one of the statements..... Click the link for more information.
Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) production function introduced by Arrow, Chenery, Minhas, and Solow, (1961), is:
where
..... Click the link for more information.
where
- = Output
- = Factor productivity
- = Share parameter
..... Click the link for more information.
In economics exponential utility refers to a specific form of the utility function, used in many contexts because of its convenience when uncertainty is present. Formally, exponential utility is given by:
where is consumption and is a constant.
..... Click the link for more information.
- ,
where is consumption and is a constant.
..... Click the link for more information.
The term quasilinear has several meanings, usually meaning something close to almost linear.
The following meanings are related to the field of mathematics and its applications in computer science and economics.
..... Click the link for more information.
The following meanings are related to the field of mathematics and its applications in computer science and economics.
..... Click the link for more information.
In mathematics, a homothety (or homothecy) is a transformation of space which dilates distances with respect to a fixed point A called the origin. The number c by which distances are multiplied is called the dilation factor or
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
Lexicographic preferences (lexicographical order based on the order of amount of each good) describe comparative preferences where an economic agent infinitely prefers one good (X) to another (Y).
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
The expected utility hypothesis is the hypothesis in economics that the utility of an facing uncertainty is calculated by considering utility in each possible state and constructing a weighted average. The weights are the agent's estimate of the probability of each state.
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
The expected utility hypothesis is the hypothesis in economics that the utility of an facing uncertainty is calculated by considering utility in each possible state and constructing a weighted average. The weights are the agent's estimate of the probability of each state.
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
Daniel Bernoulli (February 8, 1700 – March 17, 1782) was a Dutch-born mathematician who spent much of his life in Basel, Switzerland where he died. A member of a talented family of mathematicians, physicists and philosophers, he is particularly remembered for his
..... Click the link for more information.
..... Click the link for more information.
The external links in this article or section may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
Please [ improve this article] by removing excessive or inappropriate external links. Please remove this tag when this is done.
..... Click the link for more information.
Please [ improve this article] by removing excessive or inappropriate external links. Please remove this tag when this is done.
..... Click the link for more information.
This article is copied from an article on Wikipedia.org - the free encyclopedia created and edited by online user community. The text was not checked or edited by anyone on our staff. Although the vast majority of the wikipedia encyclopedia articles provide accurate and timely information please do not assume the accuracy of any particular article. This article is distributed under the terms of GNU Free Documentation License.
Herod_Archelaus