Information about Niklas Luhmann

Niklas Luhmann (December 8, 1927 - November 6, 1998) was a German sociologist, administration expert, and social systems theorist, as well as one of the most prominent modern day thinkers in the sociological systems theory.

Biography

Luhmann was born in Lüneburg, Germany, where his father's family had been running a brewery for several generations. After graduating from the Johanneum school in 1943, he was conscripted as a Luftwaffenhelfer in World War II and served for two years until, at the age of 17, he was taken prisoner of war by American troops in 1945. After the war Luhmann studied law at the University of Freiburg from 1946 to 1949, when he obtained a Dr. jur. degree, and then began a career in Lüneburg's public administration. During a sabbatical in 1961, he went to Harvard, where he met and studied under Talcott Parsons, then the world's most influential social systems theorist. In later years, Luhmann dismissed Parsons' theory, developing a rival approach of his own. Leaving the civil service in 1962, he lectured at the national Deutsche Hochschule für Verwaltungswissenschaften (University for Administrative Sciences) in Speyer, Germany, until 1965, when he was offered a position at the Sozialforschungsstelle (Social Research Centre) of the University of Münster, led by Helmut Schelsky. 1965/66 he studied one semester of sociology at the University of Münster. Two earlier books were retroactively accepted as a PhD thesis and habilitation at the University of Münster in 1966, qualifying him for a university professorship. In 1968/1969, he briefly served as a lecturer at Theodor Adorno's former chair at the University of Frankfurt, being appointed full professor of sociology at the then new-founded University of Bielefeld, Germany (until 1993). He continued to publish after his retirement, when he finally found the time to complete his magnum opus, Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft ("The Society of Society"), which appeared in 1997.

Works

Luhmann wrote prolifically, with more than three dozen books published on a variety of subjects, including law, economy, politics, art, religion, ecology, mass media, and love. While his theories have yet to make much of a mark in American sociology, his theory is currently dominant in German sociology, and has also been rather intensively received in Japan and Eastern Europe, including Russia. His relatively low profile elsewhere is partly due to the fact that translating his work is a difficult task, since his writing presents a challenge even to readers of German, including many sociologists.

Luhmann is probably best-known to North Americans for his debate with the critical theorist Jürgen Habermas over the potential of social systems theory. Like his one-time mentor Talcott Parsons, Luhmann is an advocate of the "grand theory," aiming to address any aspect of social life within a universal theoretical framework - of which the diversity of subjects he wrote about is an indication. Luhmann's theory is generally considered highly abstract, and his publications are difficult to read. This fact, along with the somewhat elitist behaviour of some of his disciples and the supposed political conservatism implicit in his theory, has made Luhmann a controversial figure in sociology. A major critique of Luhmann is found in Piyush Mathur's detailed exegesis of one of Luhmann's treatises in an American journal (See "Neither Cited nor Foundational: Niklas Luhmann's Ecological Communication", The Communication Review, 8: 329–362, 2005; for a more general critique see e.g. Alex Viskovatoff's "Foundations of Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Social Systems", Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 29:4, 481-516, 1999). Luhmann himself described his theory as "labyrinth-like" or "non-linear," and claimed he was deliberately keeping his prose enigmatic to prevent it from being understood "too quickly," which would only produce simplistic misunderstandings.

Theory

The core element of Luhmann's theory is communication. Social systems are systems of communication, and society is the most encompassing social system. Being the social system that comprises all (and only) communication, today's society is a world society. A system is defined by a boundary between itself and its environment, dividing it from an infinitely complex, or (colloquially) chaotic, exterior. The interior of the system is thus a zone of reduced complexity: Communication within a system operates by selecting only a limited amount of all information available outside. This process is also called "reduction of complexity." The criterion according to which information is selected and processed is meaning (in German, Sinn). Both social systems and psychical or personal systems (see below for an explanation of this distinction) operate by processing meaning.

Furthermore, each system has a distinctive identity that is constantly reproduced in its communication and depends on what is considered meaningful and what is not. If a system fails to maintain that identity, it ceases to exist as a system and dissolves back into the environment it emerged from. Luhmann called this process of reproduction from elements previously filtered from an over-complex environment autopoiesis (pronounced "auto-poy-E-sis"; literally: self-creation), using a term coined in cognitive biology by Chilean thinkers Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela. Social systems are autopoietically closed in that they use and rely on resources from their environment; yet those resources do not become part of the systems' operation. Both thought and digestion are important preconditions for communication, but neither appears in communication as such.

Luhmann likens the operation of autopoiesis (the filtering and processing of information from the environment) to a program, making a series of logical distinctions (in German,Unterscheidungen). Here, Luhmann refers to the British mathematician G. Spencer-Brown's logic of distinctions that Maturana and Varela had earlier identified as a model for the functioning of any cognitive process. The supreme criterion guiding the "self-creation" of any given system is a defining binary code. The influence of Spencer-Brown's book, "Laws of Form," on Luhmann cannot be overestimated.

Although Luhmann first developed his understanding of social systems theory under Parsons' influence, he soon moved away from the Parsonian concept. The most important difference is that Parsons used systems as a merely analytic tool to understand certain processes going on in society; Luhmann, in contrast, treats his vision of systems ontologically, saying that "systems exist." Another difference is that Parsons asks how certain subsystems contribute to the functioning of overall society. Luhmann starts with the differentiation of the systems themselves out of a nondescript environment. He does observe how certain systems fulfill functions that contribute to "society" as a whole, but this is happening more or less by chance, without an overarching vision of society. Finally, the systems' autopoietic closure is another fundamental difference from Parsons' concept. Each system works strictly according to its very own code and has no understanding at all for the way other systems perceive their environment. For example, the economy is all about money, so there is no independent role in the economic system for extraneous aspects such as morals.

One seemingly peculiar, but within the overall framework strictly logical, axiom of Luhmann's theory is the human being's position outside any social system. Consisting of "pure communication," any social system requires human consciousnesses (personal or psychical systems) as an obviously necessary, but nevertheless environmental resource. In Luhmann's terms, human beings are neither part of society nor of any specific systems, just as they are not part of a conversation. Luhmann himself once said concisely that he was "not interested in people."

Luhmann was devoted to the ideal of non-normative science introduced to sociology in the early 20th century by Max Weber and later re-defined and defended against its critics by Karl Popper. However, in an academic environment that never strictly separated descriptive and normative theories of society, Luhmann's sociology has widely attracted criticism from various intellectuals, perhaps most notably Jürgen Habermas.

Luhmann reception

Luhmann's systems theory is being applied or used worldwide by sociologists such as Gunther Teubner (Germany), Aldo Mascareño (Chile) Dirk Baecker (Germany), Susanne Holmström (Denmark), Ole Bjerg (Denmark), Niels Åkerstrøm Andersen (Denmark), Rudi Laermans (Belgium), Jan-Inge Jönhill (Sweden), Lars Qvortrup (Denmark), Inger-Johanne Sand (Norway), Urs Stäheli (Switzerland), Ole Thyssen (Denmark), Øjvind Larsen (Denmark), Jens Rasmussen (Denmark), Helmut Willke (Germany), Artan Muhaxhiri (Kosovo), Almiro Petry (Brazil), Gabriel Cohn (Brazil), Celso Fernandes Campilongo (Brazil), Marcelo Neves (Brazil), Peter Beyer (Canada), Alexander Filippov (Russia), Harrison White (United States), or Wil Martens (Netherlands). It is often being used in analyses dealing with corporate social responsibility, organisational legitimacy, governance structures as well as with sociology of law and of course general sociology.

Miscellaneous

Luhmann also appears as a character in Paul Wühr's work of literature Das falsche Buch (ISBN 3-446-13846-3), together with - among others - Ulrich Sonnemann, Johann Georg Hamann and Richard Buckminster Fuller.

Luhmann owned a pub ("Pons") in his native town of Lüneburg.

Main works

• 1982: Liebe als Passion: Zur Codierung von Intimität (Trans. 1984 Love as Passion)
• 1984: Soziale Systeme / Social Systems
• 1988 - 1997: A book series: Die ... der Gesellschaft (The ... of Society, e.g. Politics, Religion, Science, ...)
• 1995 Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
• 1997: Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft (The Society of Society)
• 2000 Art as a Social System. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA (translation of Die Kunst der Gesellschaft (1995))

Articles

• 2006 System as Difference. Organization, Volume 13 (1) (January 2006), pp. 37-57

External links

• soziale-systeme.de: German webpage with texts, events and bibliographies concerning Niklas Luhmann's systems theory.
• system-thinking.de: A mindmap presenting selected links on Luhmann
• sociocybernetics mailing list: mailing list concerning Niklas Luhmann's theoretical work

•  • [ e] General subfields and scientists in Cybernetics
subfields	PolycontexturalitySecond-order cyberneticsCatastrophe theoryConnectionismControl theoryDecision theoryInformation theorySemioticsSynergeticsBiological cyberneticsBiomedical cyberneticsBioroboticsComputational neuroscienceHomeostasisMedical cyberneticsNeuro cyberneticsSociocyberneticsEmergenceArtificial intelligence
related subjects	Game theory Sociology Political Science Behavioral psychology

•  • [ e] Global structure in Systems, Systems sciences and Systems scientists
Categories
Systems	Biological system Complex system Complex adaptive system Conceptual system Cultural system Dynamical system Economic system Ecosystem Formal system Global Positioning System Human organ systems Information systems Legal system Metric system Nervous system Non-linear system Operating system Physical system Political system Sensory system Social system Solar System System Systems of measurement
Fields of theory	Chaos theory Complex systems Control theory Cybernetics Holism in science Sociotechnical systems theory Systems biology Systems dynamics Systems ecology Systems engineering Systems theory Systems science
Systems scientists	Russell L. Ackoff William Ross Ashby Gregory Bateson Ludwig von Bertalanffy Kenneth E. Boulding C. West Churchman Heinz von Foerster Charles Franois Jay Wright Forrester Ralph W. Gerard Debora Hammond George Klir Niklas Luhmann Humberto Maturana Donella Meadows Mihajlo D. Mesarovic Howard T. Odum Talcott Parsons Ilya Prigogine Anatol Rapoport Francisco Varela John N. Warfield Norbert Wiener